Action1 vs ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus — 2026 comparison
A side-by-side look at how Action1 and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus compare on score, real user ratings, pricing and features.
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Free up to 20 devices; from ~$245/yr
Visit ManageEngine Patch Manager PlusThe verdict
Action1 and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus are both Patch Management Software options worth comparing. Action1 ranks higher in our editorial score (90 vs 84 out of 100). Action1 has the larger review base (1,252 reviews across 2 sources). Action1 is best for small IT teams wanting a free tier up to 200 endpoints; ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is best for budget-conscious teams wanting broad OS and app coverage. Starting price: Action1 Free up to 200 endpoints, then ~$4/endpoint/mo, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Free up to 20 devices; from ~$245/yr. See the full breakdown below, then read each review before you decide.
Side by side
| Action1 | ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 90/100 | 84/100 |
| User consensus | 4.9/5 (1,252) | 4.6/5 (598) |
| Starting price | Free up to 200 endpoints, then ~$4/endpoint/mo | Free up to 20 devices; from ~$245/yr |
| Best for | small IT teams wanting a free tier up to 200 endpoints | budget-conscious teams wanting broad OS and app coverage |
| Cross-OS (Win/Mac/Linux) | ||
| Third-party app patching | ||
| Cloud / no-VPN remote | ◑ | |
| Automation & scripting | ||
| Compliance reporting | ◑ | ◑ |
| Free tier or trial |
Action1
- Genuinely free for up to 200 endpoints with full functionality
- Fast ~5-minute cloud setup with clear patch/vulnerability dashboards
- – Built-in remote desktop is limited (no file transfer)
- – Reporting depth is limited and adding custom software is tedious
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
- Broad OS + third-party coverage from one budget-friendly console
- Cost-effective with reliable deployment and responsive support
- – Interface feels dated and navigation could be streamlined
- – Policy/report setup has a learning curve; reporting is weak